Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard I:
Information Access, Evaluation, Processing and Application
Name: Topic:
Directions: The Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard I: Information Access, Evaluation, Processing and Application will be used by the instructor to evaluate each of the 4 scoring elements using the following scoring scale:
4 Exemplary: Demonstrates an in-depth and perceptive understanding; exhibits excellent evidence of attainment of concepts.
3 Proficient: Demonstrates a thorough understanding; exhibits clear evidence of attainment of concepts.
2 Developing: Demonstrates a partial understanding; exhibits some evidence of attainment of concepts.
1 Novice: Demonstrates a lack of understanding; exhibits minimal evidence of attainment of concepts.
Target performance on this standard requires both:
· total score of at least 12
· no element score below 2
It is recommended that the teacher candidate use the scoring tool as a self-assessment before submitting the final product to the instructor. Score only the numbered elements by considering descriptors under that heading.
|
SCORING ELEMENTS |
4 Exemplary |
3 Proficient |
2 Developing |
1 Novice |
CC* |
Element Score |
|
1. Information Retrieval |
Feedback: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Problem or question and intended audience are clearly identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Information needed to solve the problem or answer the question is identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Key words to guide the search for information are identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Given the problem/question, a variety of appropriate electronic resources are identified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Information Evaluation |
Feedback: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· The log reflects a number of resources relevant to the problem were examined. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Information from each source was examined in accordance with appropriate evaluation criteria. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Information Processing |
Feedback: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Appropriate information is selected and organized. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· Final product reflects thoughtful consideration of resources to address the problem or question. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Information Application |
Feedback: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· An appropriate format to communicate results is used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· A solution to the problem or answer to the question is formulated and justified. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
· All references are cited using an appropriate format. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SCORE
|
|
|
|||||
NOTE: A teacher candidate must achieve a total score of at least 12, and no element below 2, for an overall rating of “Proficient” on Technology Standard I.
* Condition Code: M=Missing; T=Off-Topic/Off-Task; I= Illegible/Incomprehensible