Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard V:

Integrating Technology into the Curriculum and Instruction

Name:       Date:

Instructor name:

Course (if applicable):

Directions: The Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard V: Integrating Technology into the Curriculum and Instruction will be used by the instructor to evaluate each of the 4 products (lesson/activity plan, video, two reflections) using the following scoring scale:

4    Exemplary: Demonstrates an in-depth and perceptive understanding; exhibits excellent evidence of attainment of concepts.

3    Proficient: Demonstrates a thorough understanding; exhibits clear evidence of attainment of concepts.

2 Developing: Demonstrates a partial understanding; exhibits some evidence of attainment of concepts.

1    Novice: Demonstrates a lack of understanding; exhibits minimal evidence of attainment of concepts.

For the 4 product areas listed on the scoring tool, target performance on this standard requires both:

· total score of at least 12

· no product score below 3

It is recommended that the teacher candidate use the scoring tool as a self-assessment before submitting the final products. Score only the products by considering descriptors under each heading.

Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard V: Integrating

Technology into the Curriculum and Instruction

Name:     Evaluation Date:     Topic:

MTTS V: This technology standard provides evidence of the ability to design, implement, and assess learning experiences that incorporate student use of technology to support inquiry,

problem solving, communication, and/or collaboration.  This section of the scoring tool should be used to evaluate the teacher candidate’s lesson plan and delivery/implementation

of lesson.

Products: Lesson Overview Summary Sheet Lesson Plan	4 - Exemplary	3 - Proficient	2 - Developing	1 - Novice	CC*	Product Score
Look for: q Appropriate content and technology standards. q Assessment plan to measure  student learning q Software/hardware selected to engage the learner. q Technology selected to differentiate instruction and support inquiry, collaboration and/or problem solving. q Research based sources for utilizing technology in instruction.	The design of the lesson is innovative, appropriate for meeting the stated objectives and provides strong support for student learning.	The design of the lesson is appropriate for meeting the stated objective(s) and supports student learning	The design of the lesson is  somewhat appropriate for meeting the stated objective(s) and/or does not  support student learning	The design of the lesson is inappropriate for meeting the stated objective(s) and/or clearly detracts from student learning
	Feedback:
Products: Lesson Implementation         and Videotape	4 - Exemplary	3 - Proficient	2 - Developing	1 - Novice	CC*	Product Score
Look for: q Teacher involvement in lesson delivery and management of teaching environment q Student response to teacher delivery q Student engagement in learning	The implementation of the lesson shows  dynamic teacher  involvement  and strong instructional support.  There is a high degree of student/teacher interaction. The students demonstrate consistent and active engagement in meaningful learning with technology.	The implementation of the lesson shows adequate teacher involvement and good instructional support. There is adequate student/teacher interaction. The students demonstrate engagement in meaningful learning with technology.	The implementation of the lesson shows limited teacher involvement and some instructional support. There is limited student/teacher interaction. The students demonstrate  engagement in learning with technology.	The implementation of the lesson shows minimal teacher involvement and little instructional support. There is little or no student/teacher interaction. The students  demonstrate little or no engagement in learning with technology.
	Feedback:

NOTE: A teacher candidate must achieve a score of 3 or better for each of the products for an overall rating of “Proficient” on Technology Standard  V.

* Condition Code: M=Missing;  T=Off-Topic/Off-Task;  I=Illegible/Incomprehensible

Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard V: Integrating

Technology into the Curriculum and Instruction

Name:     Evaluation Date:     Topic:

Directions: This activity provides evidence of the ability to design, implement, and assess learning experiences that incorporate student use of technology to support inquiry, problem solving, communication, and/or collaboration.  This section of the scoring tool should be used to evaluate the teacher candidate’s reflections of their lesson delivery.

Product: Electronic Journal Reflections	4 - Exemplary	3 - Proficient	2 - Developing	1 - Novice	CC*	Product   Score
Activity A – Completed immediately after implementing  the lesson q Explain how the use of technology during this lesson enhanced student learning of key concepts, facts, procedures, etc. q Describe unanticipated results encountered during implementation of the lesson. What might have accounted for them? How did you adjust instruction? q Discuss what you might do differently the next time the lesson is taught. Activity B - Completed immediately after watching the video q Explain how planning for assessment  of student learning impacted the design of the lesson. q Discuss and provide examples of how student use of  technology enhanced their learning and added value to the lesson. q Describe the extent to which the classroom management/organizational strategies aided lesson implementation. q Discuss what you might do differently the next time the lesson is taught.	Reflection is thorough, insightful, and logical; key decisions are justified and plausible.	Reflection is adequate and logical; key decisions are justified and plausible.	Reflection is superficial; few decisions are justified or may be justified but not plausible.	Reflection demonstrates lack of understanding; no decisions are justified.
	Feedback:
	4 - Exemplary	3 - Proficient	2 - Developing	1 - Novice	CC*	Product  Score
	Reflection is thorough, insightful, and logical; key decisions are justified and plausible.	Reflection is adequate and logical; key decisions are justified and plausible.	Reflection is superficial; few decisions are justified or may be justified but not plausible.	Reflection demonstrates lack of understanding; no decisions are justified.
	Feedback:
	TOTAL SCORE

NOTE: A teacher candidate must achieve a score of 3 or better for each of the products for an overall rating of “Proficient” on Technology Standard  V.

* Condition Code: M=Missing;  T=Off-Topic/Off-Task;  I=Illegible/Incomprehensible