Scoring Tool for Evaluating Standard VI:
Assistive Technology

 

 

Name:                                                                                            Date:                                                         

 

Directions: The Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard VI: Assistive Technology will be used by the instructor to evaluate each of the 4 products using the following scoring scale:

4    Exemplary: Demonstrates an in-depth and perceptive understanding; exhibits excellent evidence of attainment of concepts.

3    Proficient: Demonstrates a thorough understanding; exhibits clear evidence of attainment of concepts.

2    Developing: Demonstrates a partial understanding; exhibits some evidence of attainment of concepts.

1    Novice: Demonstrates a lack of understanding; exhibits minimal evidence of attainment of concepts.

Target performance on this standard requires all of the following:

·         total score of at least 10

·         product score of 3 or better on each Part I—Gathering Data and Making Decisions and Part II—SETT Implementation Plan

·         product score of 2 or better each for Recommendations and Reflections

It is recommended that the teacher candidate use the scoring tool as a self-assessment before submitting final products to the instructor.

Identified learning needs for a particular student:                                                                                                    

                                                                                                                                                                                          

Audience: Presentation given to                                                                                                              

Form: Circle one       video              oral presentation                  electronic presentation

Collaborative sources: List both human and information resources. Indicate professional occupation of human resources if appropriate.

 

Example:

Person

 

Information Source

Ms. Jane Doe, Speech and Language Pathologist (SLP)

 

Student records; website

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

PRODUCT

SCORE

4

Exemplary

3

Proficient

2

Developing

1

Novice

CC*

Product Score

Part I—Gathering Data and Making Decisions

Utilization of human and information resources is highly effective (comprehensive and appropriate) to gather information about the identified student, environment, tasks, and tools.

Utilization of human and information resources is generally effective (comprehensive and appropriate) to gather information about the identified student, environment, tasks, and tools

Utilization of human and information resources is somewhat effective (comprehensive and appropriate) to gather information about the identified student, environment, tasks, and tools.

Utilization of human and information resources is minimally effective (comprehensive and appropriate) to gather information about the identified student, environment, tasks, and tools.

 

 

Recommendations

Descriptions of recommended low- and high-tech assistive technologies to improve learning for the identified student are consistent and highly effective. Descriptions are consistently detailed and comprehensive in scope.

Descriptions of recommended low- and high-tech assistive technologies to improve learning for the identified student are generally effective. Descriptions are somewhat detailed and fairly comprehensive in scope.

Descriptions of recommended low- and high-tech assistive technologies to improve learning for the identified student are somewhat effective. Descriptions are often general and less comprehensive in scope.

Descriptions of recommended low- and high-tech assistive technologies to improve learning for the identified student are minimally effective. Descriptions are vague or general and/or are limited in scope.

 

 

Part II—SETT Implementation Plan

SETT Implementation Plan is fully developed to include all of these components: a timeline, recommended tools and strategies, required training, and a measurement intervention. All components are described in detail.

SETT Implementation Plan is generally developed to include all of these components: a timeline, recommended tools and strategies, required training, and a measurement intervention. Most components are described in detail, while a few may be in general terms.

SETT Implementation Plan is somewhat developed to include 3 of the 4 components: a timeline, recommended tools and strategies, required training, and a measurement intervention. Some components are described in detail, while others are in general terms.

SETT Implementation Plan is minimally developed to include 2 of the 4 components: a timeline, recommended tools and strategies, required training, and a measurement intervention. Many components are described in general terms only.

 

 

Reflections

Explanation of how the recommended technologies address equity and developmental issues to enhance student learning is consistently accurate and thorough.

Explanation of how the recommended technologies address equity and developmental issues to enhance student learning is generally accurate and fairly thorough.

Explanation of how the recommended technologies address equity and developmental issues to enhance student learning is somewhat accurate but may be incomplete.

Explanation of how the recommended technologies address equity and developmental issues to enhance student learning is minimally accurate and is incomplete.

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL SCORE

 

 

NOTE: A teacher candidate must achieve a total score of at least 10, and not less than 3 each for Part I Gathering Data and Making Decisions and Part II SETT Implementation Plan and not less than 2 each for Recommendations and Reflections, for an overall rating of “Proficient” on Technology Standard VI.

* Condition Code: M=Missing;  T=Off-Task;  N=Not Readable/Illegible