Scoring Tool for Evaluating Standard VII:
Professional Growth

 

 

Name:                                                                                           Date:                                                        

 

 

Instructor Name:                                                                                                                                            

 

 

Course (if applicable):                                                                                                                                    

 

Directions: The Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard VII: Professional Growth will be used by the instructor to evaluate each of the 3 scoring elements using the following scoring scale:

 

4    Exemplary: Demonstrates an in-depth and perceptive understanding; exhibits excellent evidence of attainment of concepts.

3    Proficient: Demonstrates a thorough understanding; exhibits clear evidence of attainment of concepts.

2    Developing: Demonstrates a partial understanding; exhibits some evidence of attainment of concepts.

1    Novice: Demonstrates a lack of understanding; exhibits minimal evidence of attainment of concepts.

 

Target performance on this standard requires both:

·         total score of at least 9

·         no element score below 2

 

It is recommended that the teacher candidate use the scoring tool as a self-assessment before submitting the final product to the instructor. Score only the elements A, B and C by considering descriptors under each heading.

 

 

 


 

 

 

SCORING ELEMENT

SCORE

4

Exemplary

3

Proficient

2

Developing

1

Novice

CC*

Element Score

Part A: Conducting Research on Resources

Demonstrates exceptional skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources, based on identified goal; review of resources is thorough and up-to-date; research on resources addresses all appropriate sources from among:

·   Contacts and activities or resources.

·   Professional organizations or groups.

·   Professional practices.

·   Emerging technology(ies).

·   Local, state, and/or national standards.

Demonstrates acceptable skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources, based on identified goal; review of resources is generally thorough and up-to-date; research on resources addresses most, if not all appropriate sources from among:

·   Contacts and activities or resources.

·   Professional organizations or groups.

·   Professional practices.

·   Emerging technology(ies).

·   Local, state, and/or national standards.

Demonstrates adequate skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources, based on identified goal; review of resources is only somewhat thorough and up-to-date; research on resources addresses only some of the appropriate  sources  from among:

·   Contacts and activities or resources.

·   Professional organizations or groups.

·   Professional practices.

·   Emerging technology(ies).

·   Local, state, and/or national standards.

Demonstrates minimal skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources., based on identified goal; review of resources is only partial and may not be up-to-date; research on resources addresses few, if any, of the appropriate sources from among:

·   Contacts and activities or resources.

·   Professional organizations or groups.

·   Professional practices.

·   Emerging technology(ies).

·   Local, state, and/or national standards.

 

 

Part B: Creating a Plan of Action

Demonstrates exceptional ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan:

·   Fully articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning.

·    Organizes content in a consistently logical and effective way.

·    Consistently uses appropriate style and tone.

·    Consistently demonstrates correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context.

·    Provides all pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal.

Demonstrates acceptable ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan:

·   Generally articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning.

·    Organizes content in a generally logical and effective way

·    Generally uses appropriate style and tone.

·    Generally demonstrates correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context.

·    Provides most pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal.

Demonstrates some ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan:

·   Sometimes articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning.

·    Organizes content in a somewhat logical and effective way

·    Sometimes uses appropriate style and tone.

·    Sometimes demonstrates correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context.

·    Provides some pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal.

Demonstrates minimal ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan:

·   Rarely/never articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning.

·    Organizes content in a minimally logical and effective way

·    Rarely/never uses appropriate style and tone.

·    Demonstrates few, if any correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context.

·    Provides few, if any pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal.

 

 

Part C: Developing Criteria for Evaluation

Demonstrates exceptional ability to specify evaluation approach; provides definitive /clearly defensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her identified goal.

·   Defines clear and complete evaluation criteria and procedures, based on all the components of the identified goal.

Demonstrates adequate ability to specify evaluation approach; provides generally defensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her identified goal.

·   Defines generally clear and complete evaluation criteria and procedures, based on the components of the identified goal.

Demonstrates some ability to specify evaluation approach; provides only somewhat defensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her identified goal.

·   Defines somewhat clear and/or only partly complete evaluation criteria and procedures, based on the components of the identified goal.

Demonstrates minimal ability to specify evaluation approach; provides indefensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her  identified goal.

·   The evaluation criteria are missing, vague/ unclear and/or substantially incomplete

 

 

 

TOTAL SCORE

 

NOTE: A teacher candidate must achieve a total score of at least 12, and no element score can be below 2, for an overall rating of “Proficient” on Technology Standard VII.

* Condition Code: M=Missing; T=Off-Task; N=Not Readable/Illegible