Scoring Tool for Evaluating Standard VII:
Professional Growth
Name: Date:
Instructor Name:
Course (if applicable):
Directions: The Scoring Tool for Evaluating Technology Standard VII: Professional Growth will be used by the instructor to evaluate each of the 3 scoring elements using the following scoring scale:
4 Exemplary: Demonstrates an in-depth and perceptive understanding; exhibits excellent evidence of attainment of concepts.
3 Proficient: Demonstrates a thorough understanding; exhibits clear evidence of attainment of concepts.
2 Developing: Demonstrates a partial understanding; exhibits some evidence of attainment of concepts.
1 Novice: Demonstrates a lack of understanding; exhibits minimal evidence of attainment of concepts.
Target performance on this standard requires both:
· total score of at least 9
· no element score below 2
It is recommended that the teacher candidate use the scoring tool as a self-assessment before submitting the final product to the instructor. Score only the elements A, B and C by considering descriptors under each heading.
|
SCORING ELEMENT |
SCORE |
|||||
|
4 Exemplary |
3 Proficient |
2 Developing |
1 Novice |
CC* |
Element Score |
|
Part A: Conducting Research on Resources |
Demonstrates exceptional skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources, based on identified goal; review of resources is thorough and up-to-date; research on resources addresses all appropriate sources from among: · Contacts and activities or resources. · Professional organizations or groups. · Professional practices. · Emerging technology(ies). · Local, state, and/or national standards. |
Demonstrates acceptable skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources, based on identified goal; review of resources is generally thorough and up-to-date; research on resources addresses most, if not all appropriate sources from among: · Contacts and activities or resources. · Professional organizations or groups. · Professional practices. · Emerging technology(ies). · Local, state, and/or national standards. |
Demonstrates adequate skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources, based on identified goal; review of resources is only somewhat thorough and up-to-date; research on resources addresses only some of the appropriate sources from among: · Contacts and activities or resources. · Professional organizations or groups. · Professional practices. · Emerging technology(ies). · Local, state, and/or national standards. |
Demonstrates minimal skill in collecting data on relevant and appropriate resources., based on identified goal; review of resources is only partial and may not be up-to-date; research on resources addresses few, if any, of the appropriate sources from among: · Contacts and activities or resources. · Professional organizations or groups. · Professional practices. · Emerging technology(ies). · Local, state, and/or national standards. |
|
|
|
Part B: Creating a Plan of Action |
Demonstrates exceptional ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan: · Fully articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning. · Organizes content in a consistently logical and effective way. · Consistently uses appropriate style and tone. · Consistently demonstrates correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context. · Provides all pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal. |
Demonstrates acceptable ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan: · Generally articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning. · Organizes content in a generally logical and effective way · Generally uses appropriate style and tone. · Generally demonstrates correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context. · Provides most pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal. |
Demonstrates some ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan: · Sometimes articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning. · Organizes content in a somewhat logical and effective way · Sometimes uses appropriate style and tone. · Sometimes demonstrates correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context. · Provides some pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal. |
Demonstrates minimal ability to write a meaningful individual Professional Development Plan: · Rarely/never articulates intended ways of using the professional activity(ies), organization(s), emerging technology(ies), and standards for continued growth and learning. · Organizes content in a minimally logical and effective way · Rarely/never uses appropriate style and tone. · Demonstrates few, if any correct mechanics, usage and a form suitable for a goal statement to be shared in a professional context. · Provides few, if any pertinent attachment(s) to support actions related to the identified goal. |
|
|
|
Part C: Developing Criteria for Evaluation |
Demonstrates exceptional ability to specify evaluation approach; provides definitive /clearly defensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her identified goal. · Defines clear and complete evaluation criteria and procedures, based on all the components of the identified goal. |
Demonstrates adequate ability to specify evaluation approach; provides generally defensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her identified goal. · Defines generally clear and complete evaluation criteria and procedures, based on the components of the identified goal. |
Demonstrates some ability to specify evaluation approach; provides only somewhat defensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her identified goal. · Defines somewhat clear and/or only partly complete evaluation criteria and procedures, based on the components of the identified goal. |
Demonstrates minimal ability to specify evaluation approach; provides indefensible evidence of the degree to which the individual has met his/her identified goal. · The evaluation criteria are missing, vague/ unclear and/or substantially incomplete |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SCORE |
|
||||
NOTE: A teacher candidate must achieve a total score of at least 12, and no element score can be below 2, for an overall rating of “Proficient” on Technology Standard VII.
* Condition Code: M=Missing; T=Off-Task; N=Not Readable/Illegible